Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7950 3GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 has clock speeds of 540 MHz on the GPU, and 790 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 72 SPUs as well as 24 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 7950 3GB, which features clock speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1792 SPUs as well as 112 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon HD 7950 3GB 200 Watts
Difference: 157 Watts (365%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 7950 3GB should perform much faster than the GeForce GT 320 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 3GB 240000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 214720 (849%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7950 3GB is much (approximately 591%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 3GB 89600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 76640 (591%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7950 3GB is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 3GB 25600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 21280 (493%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7950 3GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon HD 7950 3GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 January 2012
Code Name GT215 Tahiti Pro
Memory 1024 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 200 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 240000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 89600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 1792
Texture Mapping Units 24 112
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 727 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7950 3GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield