Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870

Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 has core speeds of 810 MHz on the GPU, and 1001 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 336 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6870, which comes with core clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1050 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1120 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 150 Watts
Radeon HD 6870 151 Watts
Difference: 1 Watts (1%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon HD 6870 should theoretically be a little bit superior to the GeForce GTX 560 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 134400 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 560 128128 MB/sec
Difference: 6272 (5%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6870 will be a little bit (more or less 11%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 560. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 50400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 45360 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 5040 (11%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon HD 6870 is superior to the GeForce GTX 560, but it probably won't make a huge difference. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 28800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 25920 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2880 (11%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 560

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6870

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Radeon HD 6870
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year May 2011 October 2010
Code Name GF114 Barts XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 810 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 1600 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1001 MHz (4004 MHz effective) 1050 MHz (4200 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 336 1120
Texture Mapping Units 56 56
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 150 watts 151 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 128128 MB/sec 134400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 45360 Mtexels/sec 50400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 25920 Mpixels/sec 28800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

23 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870”
[...] qui' deduco che la ati va meglio... sbaglio?? GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]
[...] Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare I am debating this myself, and it is hard. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare This is a comparison with the regular 560 (not ti) and the Radeon [...]
[...] or 560. Quick benchmark GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare 6950 or 560ti Quick benchmark GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance [...]
Owari says:
Price range is the same and yet AMD won this one.
Im a Nvidia fan but I admit for price you should go with 6870.
dan says:
AMD HD-6870 is far superior than gtx 560.on the other hand gtx560 is more expensive
SP33D says:
These results are not accurate enough. All 560's are different. The current 560 i have is not the Ti but out-performs a 6870. Not being biased or a fanboy. I have experienced using a 6870 alone and in crossfire but the performance in games with the 560 is far better.
AMD fan says:
SP33D

Do u mean 560 can beat 6870cf?
genius.

but i have experirnce using 6870cf can beat 580,,,lol
$350 vs $500,

[...] acum 2 luni. Cealalta inca functioneaza pe caluclatorul vechi. Asta ar trbei sa te lamureasca GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Intel Core i5 Sandy Bridge 1155 @2.9 Ghz/Turbo 3.2 Ghz | AsRock H61M-VS | Gigabyte Radeon [...]
logh says:
Add the 6870x2 plz
[...] GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Hope this helps I'll see if I can any benchmarks comparing the 2. __________________ Main System [...]
[...] eine Seite die beide Karten von Stromverbrauch, Leistung und Texel/Pixel-F├╝llrate vergleicht. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare You decide __________________ Wenn man die Natur einer Sache durchschaut hat, werden [...]
Diyer says:
But the gtx 560 is better that the amd 6870.. Or more o less better..
[...] close, but HD6870 wins by a nose. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare The 560 looks like it may only have the reference cooler, and the 6870, has a IceQ. The 560 only [...]
PRD says:
ATI Shader Speed (N/A) MHz fuuuu...
[...] ca depinde de unde iti iei informatile, de exemplu pe hardware compare radeonul consuma cu un w mai mult si este putin mai rapida decat gtx-ul. __________________ OC [...]
PNN says:
Having used both (a Sapphire 6870 and an EVGA 560), the 6870 seems to be superior in most applications, however, there are certain games (such as BF3 or Hawken) where the 560 outperforms the 6870.
strat says:
My gtx560 is at 950mhz vs this 810mhz i got almost 20% OC on my card staple all day. voltage went from 1.012 to 1.050.
anoyness says:
My 560 competes with a 6950 in most cases and i have physc
lold says:
what is amazing :D this ppl who say that THEIR's GTX560 compete with hd6950 6990

They must have some alien GTX560 that is manufactured especially for those people :D

Yansen Haryanto says:
i like nvidia card but when i see this result! i choise amd! why? it's more cheaper! and it's only have increased 1 WATT TDP! for that some performance increase and 1 thing is important is! the CHEAP PRICE!
mkultra says:
Went from gtx 560 to amd radeon 6870.
The difference aren't as small as the chart describes.
The AMD over-performed the nvidia card by a landslide

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing