Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870

Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 810 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1001 MHz on this model. It features 336 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6870, which uses a 40 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 900 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1050 MHz on this model. It features 1120 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 150 Watts
Radeon HD 6870 151 Watts
Difference: 1 Watts (1%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 6870 should be just a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 560 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 134400 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 560 128128 MB/sec
Difference: 6272 (5%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6870 will be a small bit (approximately 11%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 560. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 50400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 45360 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 5040 (11%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6870 is a little bit (about 11%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 560, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon HD 6870 28800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 25920 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2880 (11%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 560

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6870

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Radeon HD 6870
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year May 2011 October 2010
Code Name GF114 Barts XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 810 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 1600 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 4004 MHz 4200 MHz
Unified Shaders 336 1120
Texture Mapping Units 56 56
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 150 watts 151 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 128128 MB/sec 134400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 45360 Mtexels/sec 50400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 25920 Mpixels/sec 28800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

23 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870”

[...] qui' deduco che la ati va meglio... sbaglio?? GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]

[...] Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare I am debating this myself, and it is hard. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare This is a comparison with the regular 560 (not ti) and the Radeon [...]

[...] or 560. Quick benchmark GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare 6950 or 560ti Quick benchmark GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance [...]

Owari says:

Price range is the same and yet AMD won this one.
Im a Nvidia fan but I admit for price you should go with 6870.

dan says:

AMD HD-6870 is far superior than gtx 560.on the other hand gtx560 is more expensive

SP33D says:

These results are not accurate enough. All 560's are different. The current 560 i have is not the Ti but out-performs a 6870. Not being biased or a fanboy. I have experienced using a 6870 alone and in crossfire but the performance in games with the 560 is far better.

AMD fan says:

SP33D

Do u mean 560 can beat 6870cf?
genius.

but i have experirnce using 6870cf can beat 580,,,lol
$350 vs $500,

[...] acum 2 luni. Cealalta inca functioneaza pe caluclatorul vechi. Asta ar trbei sa te lamureasca GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Intel Core i5 Sandy Bridge 1155 @2.9 Ghz/Turbo 3.2 Ghz | AsRock H61M-VS | Gigabyte Radeon [...]

logh says:

Add the 6870x2 plz

[...] GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Hope this helps I'll see if I can any benchmarks comparing the 2. __________________ Main System [...]

[...] eine Seite die beide Karten von Stromverbrauch, Leistung und Texel/Pixel-Füllrate vergleicht. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare You decide __________________ Wenn man die Natur einer Sache durchschaut hat, werden [...]

Diyer says:

But the gtx 560 is better that the amd 6870.. Or more o less better..

[...] close, but HD6870 wins by a nose. GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare The 560 looks like it may only have the reference cooler, and the 6870, has a IceQ. The 560 only [...]

PRD says:

ATI Shader Speed (N/A) MHz fuuuu...

[...] ca depinde de unde iti iei informatile, de exemplu pe hardware compare radeonul consuma cu un w mai mult si este putin mai rapida decat gtx-ul. __________________ OC [...]

PNN says:

Having used both (a Sapphire 6870 and an EVGA 560), the 6870 seems to be superior in most applications, however, there are certain games (such as BF3 or Hawken) where the 560 outperforms the 6870.

strat says:

My gtx560 is at 950mhz vs this 810mhz i got almost 20% OC on my card staple all day. voltage went from 1.012 to 1.050.

anoyness says:

My 560 competes with a 6950 in most cases and i have physc

lold says:

what is amazing :D this ppl who say that THEIR's GTX560 compete with hd6950 6990

They must have some alien GTX560 that is manufactured especially for those people :D

Yansen Haryanto says:

i like nvidia card but when i see this result! i choise amd! why? it's more cheaper! and it's only have increased 1 WATT TDP! for that some performance increase and 1 thing is important is! the CHEAP PRICE!

mkultra says:

Went from gtx 560 to amd radeon 6870.
The difference aren't as small as the chart describes.
The AMD over-performed the nvidia card by a landslide

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing