 |
 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770
Intro
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti features a GPU core speed of 822 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1002 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 Stream Processors, 64 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 5770, which has a clock speed of 850 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1200 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It features 800(160x5) SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 5770 |
|
108 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
170 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should in theory be a lot superior to the Radeon HD 5770 in general. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
128256 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 5770 |
|
76800 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is much (more or less 55%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 5770. (explain)| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
52608 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5770 |
|
34000 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a better choice, by far. (explain)| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
26304 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5770 |
|
13600 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 560 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 5770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | January 2011 | October 13, 2009 |
| Code Name | GF114 | Juniper XT |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
| Core Speed | 822 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 4008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 170 watts | 108 watts |
| Bandwidth | 128256 MB/sec | 76800 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 52608 Mtexels/sec | 34000 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 26304 Mpixels/sec | 13600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 384 | 800(160x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 40 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 1950 million | 1040 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 3.2 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.
GeForce GTX 560 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 5770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
3 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770”[...] permalink hier sind die beiden mal in vergleich... GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]
[...] Third argument is upgradability. Go google “iMac”. Look at it. It’s a giant white square pancake with a keyboard and a mouse with one button connected to it. It’s like a laptop: not very powerful and annoying to upgrade. Notice I said “annoying” and not impossible. Upgrading RAM is just finding compatible RAM and slotting it in which I think means the Apple store or Apple suppliers only. Not much room for fans there either. I went to the electronics store here the other day and touched the back of the screen of an iMac that had been on all day… it literally burnt my fingers. You could look into the Mac Pro, the tower Mac but they range in price from $2.5k- $5k (AU$3k-$6k). Here I’d like to point out that for AU$3400 (comparing to the AU$6k Mac Pro), you can get the NRG Avalanche that has half the cores (6 cores @ 3.9Ghz that have been overclocked to 4.5Ghz), twice as much hard drive space (plus a 120GB SSD), 10GB more RAM, and a slightly more powerful graphics card. [...]
[...] and this build are between the CPU and graphics card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti in our build offers significantly better performance, so if your needs are GPU-intensive you’re in much better shape with the Hack Pro. When it [...]