Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X


The GeForce GTX 750 Ti features a GPU core speed of 1020 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1350 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 260X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 1100 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1625 MHz on this card. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs


These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4562 points
Radeon R7 260X 4381 points
Difference: 181 (4%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 260X 95 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 72 Sol/s
Difference: 23 (32%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 Watts
Radeon R7 260X 115 Watts
Difference: 55 Watts (92%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R7 260X should perform just a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 104000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Difference: 17600 (20%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X will be a lot (about 51%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 61600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 20800 (51%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X will be a small bit (more or less 8%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and should be capable of handling higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 17600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1280 (8%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 260X

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon R7 260X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 October 2013
Code Name GM107 Bonaire XTX
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1020 MHz 1100 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 6500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 115 watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 104000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40800 Mtexels/sec 61600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16320 Mpixels/sec 17600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 896
Texture Mapping Units 40 56
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1870 million 2080 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.4 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 260X

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


9 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X”
Blair says:

The 260X should be killing the 750 Ti in benchmarks. You can clearly see it has more horsepower. A higher Texel Rate Higher Pixel Rate and Higher Memory Bandwidth. But thanks to AMD's Drivers, LOL, The R7 265 does kill the 750 Ti and is the same price. But the R7 265 could be much faster in benchmarks too if AMD could get get someone who could actually make drivers. What AMD needs to do is just scrap all drivers they have and start with new code. That is the only way they are ever going to fix their driver issues. And they need to fire whoever the idiots are that are constantly making the decision to keep putting out drivers with the same problems they have had for years over and over again!

Jhon says:

You're right blair. I think that's the main reason they're starting with the mantle thing to begin with. I know that's more like a second layer and not the drive but the performarce is clearly's better now. Hope this works out for AMD.

John from CZ says:

It is only instatant compare based on technical specifications. In reality HW of GTX is more powerfull, better and faster than R7. Power consuption in this price level graphics cards is importatnt too. Sorry for my bad English. Do you understand I want to tell you?

clark says:

the R7 260X destroys the 750 TI but it uses twice the wattage which makes it not really worth it considering it's not that much more powerful than the TI

Camdex says:

You have the 750ti only supporting DirectX 11 when it actually supports DirectX 11.2 like you have listed for the 260X.

Daniel says:

could I run the 260X on a 500w psu?

James says:

Yes Daniel the 260X has a 500w requirement. The gtx 750ti needs only 400w. But wattage isnt the most important part. The 260x need 30-33 amps on 12V rail, while the gtx only 20 amps. Check ur psu. (I bought the gtx 750ti, and had to replace my 400w psu which had only 15 amps, with another with 30 amps on 12V)(corsair CX430)

elbeto57 says:

James says: my poweer supply unit says: 12v 17 Amp 12v1 14 Amp.

Is this enougth? for 750 Ti ?

Actually own a HD 5770 and plays great 😀

javad says:

i have both of them r7 260x have more sound but in red dead redemption i got 29 fps in low
but 750ti is silent cooler but i got 25 fps in red dead 2 now i have gigabyte gtx 970 windforce
its a killer o advice for someone want to have low budget system

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield