 |
 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X
Intro
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti features a core clock frequency of 1020 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1350 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which comes with core clock speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 896 SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.
Benchmarks
These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
4562 points |
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
4381 points |
|
|
Zcash Mining Hash Rate
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
95 Sol/s |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
72 Sol/s |
|
|
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
60 Watts |
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
115 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon R7 260X should in theory be just a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in general. (explain)
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
104000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
86400 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon R7 260X should be much (about 51%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)| Radeon R7 260X |
|
61600 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
40800 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R7 260X is the winner, though not by far. (explain)| Radeon R7 260X |
|
17600 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
16320 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 750 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 260XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | February 2014 | October 2013 |
| Code Name | GM107 | Bonaire XTX |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 1020 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5400 MHz | 6500 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 60 watts | 115 watts |
| Bandwidth | 86400 MB/sec | 104000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 40800 Mtexels/sec | 61600 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 16320 Mpixels/sec | 17600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 640 | 896 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | 56 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1870 million | 2080 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.4 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GTX 750 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 260XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
9 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X”The 260X should be killing the 750 Ti in benchmarks. You can clearly see it has more horsepower. A higher Texel Rate Higher Pixel Rate and Higher Memory Bandwidth. But thanks to AMD's Drivers, LOL, The R7 265 does kill the 750 Ti and is the same price. But the R7 265 could be much faster in benchmarks too if AMD could get get someone who could actually make drivers. What AMD needs to do is just scrap all drivers they have and start with new code. That is the only way they are ever going to fix their driver issues. And they need to fire whoever the idiots are that are constantly making the decision to keep putting out drivers with the same problems they have had for years over and over again!
You're right blair. I think that's the main reason they're starting with the mantle thing to begin with. I know that's more like a second layer and not the drive but the performarce is clearly's better now. Hope this works out for AMD.
It is only instatant compare based on technical specifications. In reality HW of GTX is more powerfull, better and faster than R7. Power consuption in this price level graphics cards is importatnt too. Sorry for my bad English. Do you understand I want to tell you?
the R7 260X destroys the 750 TI but it uses twice the wattage which makes it not really worth it considering it's not that much more powerful than the TI
You have the 750ti only supporting DirectX 11 when it actually supports DirectX 11.2 like you have listed for the 260X.
could I run the 260X on a 500w psu?
Yes Daniel the 260X has a 500w requirement. The gtx 750ti needs only 400w. But wattage isnt the most important part. The 260x need 30-33 amps on 12V rail, while the gtx only 20 amps. Check ur psu. (I bought the gtx 750ti, and had to replace my 400w psu which had only 15 amps, with another with 30 amps on 12V)(corsair CX430)
James says: my poweer supply unit says: 12v 17 Amp 12v1 14 Amp.
Is this enougth? for 750 Ti ?
Actually own a HD 5770 and plays great 😀
i have both of them r7 260x have more sound but in red dead redemption i got 29 fps in low
but 750ti is silent cooler but i got 25 fps in red dead 2 now i have gigabyte gtx 970 windforce
its a killer o advice for someone want to have low budget system