Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 6750

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 features a clock frequency of 540 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 790 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is made up of 72 SPUs, 24 TAUs, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6750, which has clock speeds of 725 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 720 SPUs as well as 36 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon HD 6750 86 Watts
Difference: 43 Watts (100%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 6750, in theory, should be much faster than the GeForce GT 320 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 64000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 38720 (153%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 should be much (more or less 101%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 26100 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 13140 (101%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 should be quite a bit (more or less 169%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 320, and will be able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 11600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7280 (169%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon HD 6750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 January 2011
Code Name GT215 Juniper Pro
Memory 1024 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 86 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 26100 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 720
Texture Mapping Units 24 36
Render Output Units 8 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 727 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.0

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield