Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 has a GPU clock speed of 540 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM is set to run at 790 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 72 Stream Processors, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6950 2GB, which features a clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1250 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is made up of 1408 SPUs, 88 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 200 Watts
Difference: 157 Watts (365%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon HD 6950 2GB is 533% faster than the GeForce GT 320 overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 160000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 134720 (533%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6950 2GB will be a lot (more or less 443%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 70400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 57440 (443%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon HD 6950 2GB is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 25600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 21280 (493%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6950 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon HD 6950 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 December 2010
Code Name GT215 Cayman Pro
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 200 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 160000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 70400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 1408
Texture Mapping Units 24 88
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 727 million 2640 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6950 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield