Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1630 features clock speeds of 1740 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR6 RAM. It features 512 SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM memory. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1630 75 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Difference: 100 Watts (133%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 Nano should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 1630 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1630 98304 MB/sec
Difference: 413696 (421%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be a lot (approximately 360%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 1630. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 1630 55680 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 200320 (360%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is much (more or less 130%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 1630, and also should be capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 1630 27840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 36160 (130%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1630

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1630 Radeon R9 Nano
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2022 September 2015
Code Name TU117 Fiji XT
Memory 4096 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1740 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1500 GB/s 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 175 watts
Bandwidth 98304 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 55680 Mtexels/sec 256000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 27840 Mpixels/sec 64000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 512 4096
Texture Mapping Units 32 256
Render Output Units 16 64
Bus Type GDDR6 HBM
Bus Width 64-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1630

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield