Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a GPU core speed of 1485 MHz, and the 4096 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 2001 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 290, which has clock speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 2560 SPUs along with 160 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Radeon R9 290 300 Watts
Difference: 225 Watts (300%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 290, in theory, should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 1650 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 290 320000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Difference: 188928 (144%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 290 should be a lot (approximately 54%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 1650. (explain)

Radeon R9 290 128000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 44840 (54%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R9 290 is the winner, but only just. (explain)

Radeon R9 290 51200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3680 (8%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 290

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 290
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 November 2013
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Hawaii PRO
Memory 4096 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 300 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 320000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 128000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 51200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 2560
Texture Mapping Units 56 160
Render Output Units 32 64
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 512-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 6200 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 290

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield