Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 M265X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses a 12 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 1485 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 2001 MHz on this specific card. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 M265X, which comes with GPU clock speed of 575 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 640 Stream Processors, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 1650 should perform much faster than the Radeon R9 M265X overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 59072 (82%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 is quite a bit (more or less 262%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon R9 M265X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 23000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 60160 (262%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 1650 is superior to the Radeon R9 M265X, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 9200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 38320 (417%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 M265X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 May 1 2014
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Venus Pro
Memory 4096 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 575 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 23000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 9200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 640
Texture Mapping Units 56 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield