Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 M330

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 makes use of a 12 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1485 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a speed of 2001 MHz on this card. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon R5 M330, which features a core clock frequency of 1030 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also features a 64-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 320 SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 1650 should in theory be a lot superior to the Radeon R5 M330 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Radeon R5 M330 14400 MB/sec
Difference: 116672 (810%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 should be quite a bit (more or less 304%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon R5 M330. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R5 M330 20600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 62560 (304%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 1650 is superior to the Radeon R5 M330, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R5 M330 8240 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 39280 (477%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R5 M330

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R5 M330
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 2015
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Oland
Memory 4096 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 1030 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 14400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 20600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 8240 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 320
Texture Mapping Units 56 20
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR5 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 64-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R5 M330

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield