 |
 |
Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 3650 256MB
Intro
The Radeon HD 3650 uses a 55 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 725 MHz. The GDDR4 memory is set to run at a frequency of 800 MHz on this particular model. It features 120(24x5) SPUs as well as 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 3650 256MB, which has core speeds of 725 MHz on the GPU, and 800 MHz on the 256 MB of DDR2 RAM. It features 120(24x5) SPUs along with 8 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Both cards have the same power consumption.Memory Bandwidth
Both cards have the exact same bandwidth, so theoretically they should have the same performance. (explain)
Texel Rate
Both cards have the exact same texel rate, so in theory they should be equally good at at anisotropic filtering. (explain)Pixel Rate
Both cards have the exact same pixel rate, so in theory they should perform equally good at at full screen anti-aliasing, and be capable of handling the same screen resolutions. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 3650Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 3650 256MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 3650 | Radeon HD 3650 256MB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Code Name | RV635 PRO | RV635 PRO |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 256 MB |
| Core Speed | 725 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 78 watts | 78 watts |
| Bandwidth | 25600 MB/sec | 25600 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 5800 Mtexels/sec | 5800 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 2900 Mpixels/sec | 2900 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 120(24x5) | 120(24x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 8 | 8 |
| Render Output Units | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Type | GDDR4 | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Transistors | (Unknown) million | (Unknown) million |
| Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16/AGP 8x | PCIe 2.0 x16/AGP 8x |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10.1 | DirectX 10.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 3.0 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.
Radeon HD 3650Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 3650 256MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!