GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which comes with core clock speeds of 1382 MHz on the GPU, and 1890 MHz on the 16384 MB of HBM2 RAM. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition		21379 points
GeForce GTX 970M		7520 points
	Difference: 13859 (184%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 970M		75 Watts
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition		300 Watts
	Difference: 225 Watts (300%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 970M overall. (explain)

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition		495452 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 970M		96000 MB/sec
	Difference: 399452 (416%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is quite a bit (approximately 379%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 970M. (explain)

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition		353792 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 970M		73920 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 279872 (379%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition should be a lot (more or less 99%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 970M, and will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition		88448 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 970M		44352 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 44096 (99%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.