Compare any two graphics cards:
Nvidia Titan X vs Radeon R9 Nano
IntroThe Nvidia Titan X makes use of a 16 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1417 MHz. The GDDR5X memory runs at a frequency of 1251 MHz on this specific model. It features 3584 SPUs as well as 224 TAUs and 96 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features a clock speed of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory speed of 500 MHz. It also features a 4096-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 ROPs.
Display Graphs
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthTheoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Nano should be a bit faster than the Nvidia Titan X in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe Nvidia Titan X will be quite a bit (approximately 24%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)
Pixel RateIf using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Nvidia Titan X is the winner, by far. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!