Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 M375

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features core speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon R9 M375, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1015 MHz. The DDR3 memory is set to run at a speed of 1100 MHz on this particular model. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is 218% faster than the Radeon R9 M375 in general, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M375 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 76688 (218%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should be just a bit (approximately 2%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 M375. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M375 40600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 872 (2%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 M375 is the winner, though only just barely. (explain)

Radeon R9 M375 16240 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 112 (1%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M375

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 M375
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 2015
Code Name G200 Cape Verde
Memory 896 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1015 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 40600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16240 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M375

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield