Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 M270X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a speed of 999 MHz on this particular model. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 M270X, which has core clock speeds of 725 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should theoretically be a lot better than the Radeon R9 M270X overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 39888 (55%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is much (about 43%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 M270X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 29000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 12472 (43%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should be much (more or less 39%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon R9 M270X, and also should be able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 11600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4528 (39%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 M270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 May 1 2014
Code Name G200 Venus XT
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 29000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield