Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 M265X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features core clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 M265X, which has core clock speeds of 575 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be 55% faster than the Radeon R9 M265X overall, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 39888 (55%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be much (more or less 80%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon R9 M265X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 23000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 18472 (80%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be quite a bit (approximately 75%) better at AA than the Radeon R9 M265X, and able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 9200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 6928 (75%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 M265X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 May 1 2014
Code Name G200 Venus Pro
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 575 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 23000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 9200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield