Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 970M

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a frequency of 999 MHz on this card. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 970M, which comes with core clock speeds of 924 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1280 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 48 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 970M 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 127 Watts (169%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should perform a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 970M overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 970M 96000 MB/sec
Difference: 15888 (17%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 970M will be quite a bit (approximately 78%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

GeForce GTX 970M 73920 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 32448 (78%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 970M is a better choice, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 970M 44352 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 28224 (175%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 970M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 GeForce GTX 970M
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 16, 2008 October 7 2014
Code Name G200 GM204
Memory 896 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 924 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 75 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 96000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 73920 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 44352 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 1280
Texture Mapping Units 72 80
Render Output Units 28 48
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 970M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield