Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 3650

Intro

The GeForce GTX 965M has a clock speed of 944 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1000 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1024 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 3650, which comes with GPU core speed of 725 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR4 memory running at 800 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 120(24x5) SPUs, 8 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 965M 60 Watts
Radeon HD 3650 78 Watts
Difference: 18 Watts (30%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 965M should be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 3650 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 64000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 3650 25600 MB/sec
Difference: 38400 (150%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M is much (about 942%) more effective at AF than the Radeon HD 3650. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 60416 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 3650 5800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 54616 (942%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 965M is a better choice, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 30208 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 3650 2900 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 27308 (942%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 3650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 965M Radeon HD 3650
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 5 2015 2008
Code Name GM204 RV635 PRO
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 944 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 4000 MHz 1600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 78 watts
Bandwidth 64000 MB/sec 25600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 60416 Mtexels/sec 5800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 30208 Mpixels/sec 2900 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1024 120(24x5)
Texture Mapping Units 64 8
Render Output Units 32 4
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR4
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 55 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16/AGP 8x
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 3650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield