Geforce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The HBM memory works at a speed of 500 MHz on this particular card. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
Geforce GTX 770		7854 points
	Difference: 6939 (88%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Fury X		30 Mh/s
Geforce GTX 770		14 Mh/s
	Difference: 16 (114%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
Geforce GTX 770		70 Sol/s
	Difference: 380 (543%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 770		230 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 45 Watts (20%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Fury X should be a lot faster than the Geforce GTX 770 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 770		224384 MB/sec
	Difference: 287616 (128%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Fury X is a lot (about 101%) better at AF than the Geforce GTX 770. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 770		133888 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 134912 (101%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Fury X will be a lot (approximately 101%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 770, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 770		33472 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 33728 (101%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.