Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon R7 250X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 features core clock speeds of 633 MHz on the GPU, and 1134 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon R7 250X, which features core speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250X 95 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 124 Watts (131%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be a lot superior to the Radeon R7 250X in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 55008 (76%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is a lot (about 27%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 250X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250X 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10640 (27%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is just a bit (more or less 11%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 250X, and able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250X 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1724 (11%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon R7 250X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 February 2014
Code Name G200b Cape Verde XT
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 95 watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 640
Texture Mapping Units 80 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield