Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 540 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a speed of 790 MHz on this specific model. It features 72 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon R7 250, which has core clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1150 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 384 SPUs along with 24 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 22 Watts (51%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R7 250 should in theory be a lot faster than the GeForce GT 320 overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 48320 (191%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 will be quite a bit (about 85%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11040 (85%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R7 250 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3680 (85%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 October 2013
Code Name GT215 Oland XT
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 384
Texture Mapping Units 24 24
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 727 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield