Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features core speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 240, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 730 MHz, and 2048 MB of DDR3 memory running at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 320 SPUs, 20 TAUs, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 172 Watts (573%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should be 289% faster than the Radeon R7 240 overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 83088 (289%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be quite a bit (more or less 184%) better at AF than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 26872 (184%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10288 (176%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200 Oland PRO
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 320
Texture Mapping Units 72 20
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield