Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 900 MHz. The DDR3 memory runs at a speed of 1782 MHz on this card. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm, which has clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 106 Watts (163%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be a lot faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 54864 (96%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be a lot (approximately 44%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 12672 (44%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1728 (12%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 December 22, 2008
Code Name GK107 G200b
Memory 2048 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 576 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 1998 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 171 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 41472 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 216
Texture Mapping Units 32 72
Render Output Units 16 28
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 55 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm”
Don says:

Thank you so much for this comparison. I own the 260 & wondered if a new, budget card was worth it. Answer: nope!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield