Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon HD 5770

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 comes with core clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 192 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 5770, which comes with GPU clock speed of 850 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1200 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 800(160x5) SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5770 108 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 74 Watts (69%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 260 should perform a lot faster than the Radeon HD 5770 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
Radeon HD 5770 76800 MB/sec
Difference: 35088 (46%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 is a little bit (more or less 8%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 5770. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 5770 34000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 2864 (8%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 is superior to the Radeon HD 5770, not by a very large margin though. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5770 13600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2528 (19%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 5770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Radeon HD 5770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 16, 2008 October 13, 2009
Code Name G200 Juniper XT
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 850 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 182 watts 108 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 76800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 36864 Mtexels/sec 34000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 13600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 192 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 64 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.1 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.2

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 5770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

2 Responses to “GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon HD 5770”
Anonymous says:

[...] Solo por curiosidad tb evalue tu targeta pero por hwcompare con la mia para ver el consumo: gtx 260 vs HD 5770 el tema del consumo indica ahi q deberia tener una fuente de minimo 500W reales, es mejor q antes [...]

Factor Sorpresa says:

Cual es mas veloz?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield