 |
 |
GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 vs Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)
Intro
The GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 550 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a speed of 850 MHz on this particular card. It features 96 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 6670 (OEM), which features a core clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1000 MHz. It also features a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It is made up of 480 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) |
|
63 Watts |
| GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 |
|
70 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
As far as performance goes, the Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) should theoretically be a little bit superior to the GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 overall. (explain)
| Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) |
|
64000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 |
|
54400 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) will be just a bit (about 9%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 240 GDDR5. (explain)| Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) |
|
19200 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 |
|
17600 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) is quite a bit (more or less 45%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 240 GDDR5, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)| Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) |
|
6400 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 |
|
4400 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GT 240 GDDR5Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 | Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | Novermber 2009 | February 2011 |
| Code Name | GT215 | Turks |
| Memory | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Core Speed | 550 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 3400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 70 watts | 63 watts |
| Bandwidth | 54400 MB/sec | 64000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 17600 Mtexels/sec | 19200 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 4400 Mpixels/sec | 6400 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 96 | 480 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 32 | 24 |
| Render Output Units | 8 | 8 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 289 million | 715 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10.1 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.2 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GT 240 GDDR5Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 vs Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)”[...] 24 Originally Posted by maxold90 @HassaanAhmed the link i give you is not only about driver its about the setting of 3d card that how it effect on game performance . any how make simple decision 1=you want to buy new card or used ? 2=Yes @AbbY right that more then 1 gb ram is only use full if you have some high end graphics card like gtx680 (which cost is around 50k) other wise in your 8k budget the card v.ram more then 1 gb is useless 3=GT240 and 9800gt both are remarkable card but yes more prefer to GT240 . 4=Before using nvidia by my self i am ATI user but for experiment i switch to nvidia card and i get more performance then ati card of same budget + the sharpness in texture as well . 5=common dude now make decision and buy card because almost half of the vocations passed away what are you waiting for Wht Do You Mean I Only Need 1 GB Ram To Run BF3 .... I Said About 6670 ... ITs Better Than GT240 GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 vs Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Co... [...]