GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 vs Radeon HD 6450 (OEM)

Intro

Compare that to the Radeon HD 6450 (OEM), which comes with GPU core speed of 625 MHz, and 512 MB of GDDR3 memory set to run at 800 MHz through a 64-bit bus. It also is made up of 160 SPUs, 8 Texture Address Units, and 4 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6450 (OEM)		31 Watts
GeForce GT 240 GDDR5		70 Watts
	Difference: 39 Watts (126%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the Radeon HD 6450 (OEM) in general. (explain)

GeForce GT 240 GDDR5		54400 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6450 (OEM)		12800 MB/sec
	Difference: 41600 (325%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 will be much (more or less 252%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 6450 (OEM). (explain)

GeForce GT 240 GDDR5		17600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 6450 (OEM)		5000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 12600 (252%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 will be a lot (more or less 76%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon HD 6450 (OEM), and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GT 240 GDDR5		4400 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6450 (OEM)		2500 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1900 (76%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.