Geforce GTX 760 vs Nvidia Titan Xp

Intro

Compare all of that to the Nvidia Titan Xp, which features a core clock speed of 1582 MHz and a GDDR5X memory frequency of 1426 MHz. It also features a 384-bit bus, and uses a 16 nm design. It is made up of 3840 SPUs, 240 TAUs, and 96 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 22015 (372%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 80 Watts (47%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Nvidia Titan Xp will be 192% faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 368589 (192%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be a lot (approximately 304%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 285600 (304%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Nvidia Titan Xp is superior to the Geforce GTX 760, and very much so. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 120512 (384%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.