Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The HBM memory is set to run at a speed of 500 MHz on this particular card. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
	Difference: 13145 (89%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
	Difference: 360 (80%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Nvidia Titan Xp, in theory, should perform just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 Fury X in general. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48845 (10%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is quite a bit (more or less 41%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon R9 Fury X. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 110880 (41%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Nvidia Titan Xp is superior to the Radeon R9 Fury X, and very much so. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 84672 (126%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.