Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM memory running at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is comprised of 4096 Stream Processors, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
	Difference: 13020 (87%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Nano		402 Sol/s
	Difference: 408 (101%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 75 Watts (43%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Nvidia Titan Xp should theoretically be a little bit better than the Radeon R9 Nano overall. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48845 (10%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp will be quite a bit (about 48%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 123680 (48%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Nvidia Titan Xp is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 87872 (137%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.