Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Nano, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM memory set to run at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also features 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
	Difference: 13020 (87%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Nano		402 Sol/s
	Difference: 408 (101%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 75 Watts (43%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Nvidia Titan Xp should be 10% quicker than the Radeon R9 Nano overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48845 (10%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be a lot (approximately 48%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 123680 (48%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Nvidia Titan Xp is a better choice, and very much so. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 87872 (137%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.