Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features core speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM memory. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 8995 (152%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		30 Mh/s
Geforce GTX 760		13 Mh/s
	Difference: 17 (131%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 5 Watts (3%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Nano will be 166% faster than the Geforce GTX 760 overall, due to its greater bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 319744 (166%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be much (about 172%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 161920 (172%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be quite a bit (more or less 104%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and also should be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 32640 (104%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.