Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Nano, which has a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also makes use of a 4096-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 8995 (152%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		30 Mh/s
Geforce GTX 760		13 Mh/s
	Difference: 17 (131%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 5 Watts (3%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 Nano should be a lot faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 319744 (166%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be quite a bit (about 172%) more effective at texture filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 161920 (172%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano will be much (more or less 104%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and should be capable of handling higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 32640 (104%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.