GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 370 2G

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 370 2G, which comes with a clock frequency of 975 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1400 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1024 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R7 370 2G		5582 points
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
	Difference: 1020 (22%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 370 2G		210 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 138 (192%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R7 370 2G		110 Watts
	Difference: 50 Watts (83%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R7 370 2G should theoretically be a lot better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 370 2G		179200 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 92800 (107%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 370 2G should be much (approximately 53%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R7 370 2G		62400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 21600 (53%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 370 2G is a lot (about 91%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and should be able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R7 370 2G		31200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 14880 (91%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.