Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GTX 970 uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a speed of 1750 MHz on this specific model. It features 1664 SPUs as well as 104 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 250, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1150 MHz on this specific model. It features 384 SPUs along with 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 970 10867 points
Radeon R7 250 1836 points
Difference: 9031 (492%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 970 145 Watts
Difference: 80 Watts (123%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 970 should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the Radeon R7 250 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 970 224000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
Difference: 150400 (204%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 970 will be much (more or less 355%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

GeForce GTX 970 109200 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 85200 (355%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 970 should be much (approximately 740%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 250, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 970 67200 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 59200 (740%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 970

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 970 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2014 October 2013
Code Name GM204-200 Oland XT
Memory 4096 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 1050 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 7000 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 224000 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 109200 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 67200 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1664 384
Texture Mapping Units 104 24
Render Output Units 64 8
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 5200 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.2 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 970

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield