Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 280

Intro

The Radeon R7 250 makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1150 MHz on this specific model. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon R9 280, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 933 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this specific card. It features 1792 SPUs along with 112 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 280 7961 points
Radeon R7 250 1836 points
Difference: 6125 (334%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Radeon R9 280 250 Watts
Difference: 185 Watts (285%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 280, in theory, should be a lot faster than the Radeon R7 250 overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 280 240000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
Difference: 166400 (226%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 280 will be a lot (about 335%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

Radeon R9 280 104496 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 80496 (335%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R9 280 is superior to the Radeon R7 250, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon R9 280 29856 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 21856 (273%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R7 250 Radeon R9 280
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year October 2013 March 2014
Code Name Oland XT Tahiti Pro
Memory 1024 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 933 MHz
Memory Speed 4600 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 73600 MB/sec 240000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 24000 Mtexels/sec 104496 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 8000 Mpixels/sec 29856 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 1792
Texture Mapping Units 24 112
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1040 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.2 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield