Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 270
IntroThe GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1350 MHz on this particular card. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 270, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 900 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1400 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 1280 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthAs far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 270 should in theory be much superior to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R9 270 is much (approximately 76%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon R9 270 should be a lot (more or less 76%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
13 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 270”This is no comparison. The R9 270 is a high end card. The 750 Ti is a Entry level card.
I HAD A GTX 750 Ti AND A GTX 760 BY PNY DIE ON ME AMD FTW
AMD fanboys...
Ahem.
GTX 750 Ti is NOT an entry level Graphics card. R9 270 is in the middle-high end level so this is pointless.
They both cost $150, so not a pointless comparision.
The r9 270/270x used to cost around the $300 before the huge bitcoin/litecoin rush, so after the inflation of AMD card prices, they dropped considerably, placing the r9 270 to about $170 range. So yes, it is a pointless comparison.
And yet I purchased my r9 270 for about 150. As the price point stands now, the only pointless part of the comparison is that the 750ti is pointless. For pretty close to the exact same price you can get double the performance.
I am worried about the extra heat generated by the AMD card (150 vs. 60 Watts). What does this say about longevity and how does this affect the rest of the computer's components?
Dell offers both cards in their XPS 8700 Desktop computer. I tend towards the nvidia card because of lower price and better (perhaps) reliability. I am willing to swallow the lower performance. I am not much of a gamer 🙂
same price, almost double performance, cons is power consumption? r9-270 for sure... -_-
Guys wich card i should bring for best gaming
my psu is 400w which is very small would it be worth spending an extra £40 ($61.58) for a new psu and then buy r9 270 or should i settle with the 750ti, fyi i game on a single monitor at 1680x1050
dont cheap out on the psu!! so 750 ti ...
Hi. this is the comparison im looking for. what im confusedabout is the r9 270's current price| and will if fit in a mATX mobo and case? will it be compatible with my mobo? my mobo is msi ms7721 fm2-a55m-e33.