Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 270
IntroThe GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a GPU core speed of 1020 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 1350 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 Stream Processors, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 270, which features core clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1400 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1280 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 32 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthAs far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 270 should in theory be much superior to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R9 270 will be a lot (more or less 76%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon R9 270 will be much (approximately 76%) better at AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and also should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
13 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 270”This is no comparison. The R9 270 is a high end card. The 750 Ti is a Entry level card.
I HAD A GTX 750 Ti AND A GTX 760 BY PNY DIE ON ME AMD FTW
AMD fanboys...
Ahem.
GTX 750 Ti is NOT an entry level Graphics card. R9 270 is in the middle-high end level so this is pointless.
They both cost $150, so not a pointless comparision.
The r9 270/270x used to cost around the $300 before the huge bitcoin/litecoin rush, so after the inflation of AMD card prices, they dropped considerably, placing the r9 270 to about $170 range. So yes, it is a pointless comparison.
And yet I purchased my r9 270 for about 150. As the price point stands now, the only pointless part of the comparison is that the 750ti is pointless. For pretty close to the exact same price you can get double the performance.
I am worried about the extra heat generated by the AMD card (150 vs. 60 Watts). What does this say about longevity and how does this affect the rest of the computer's components?
Dell offers both cards in their XPS 8700 Desktop computer. I tend towards the nvidia card because of lower price and better (perhaps) reliability. I am willing to swallow the lower performance. I am not much of a gamer 🙂
same price, almost double performance, cons is power consumption? r9-270 for sure... -_-
Guys wich card i should bring for best gaming
my psu is 400w which is very small would it be worth spending an extra £40 ($61.58) for a new psu and then buy r9 270 or should i settle with the 750ti, fyi i game on a single monitor at 1680x1050
dont cheap out on the psu!! so 750 ti ...
Hi. this is the comparison im looking for. what im confusedabout is the r9 270's current price| and will if fit in a mATX mobo and case? will it be compatible with my mobo? my mobo is msi ms7721 fm2-a55m-e33.