Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB vs Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Intro

The GeForce 8400 GS 512MB features clock speeds of 650 MHz on the GPU, and 400 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR2 RAM. It features 16 SPUs along with 8 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 250X 2GB, which comes with clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 40 Watts
Radeon R7 250X 2GB 95 Watts
Difference: 55 Watts (138%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB, in theory, should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB in general. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 72000 MB/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 6400 MB/sec
Difference: 65600 (1025%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB is a lot (approximately 669%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 40000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 5200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 34800 (669%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB will be much (more or less 515%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB, and should be able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 16000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 2600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 13400 (515%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 8400 GS 512MB Radeon R7 250X 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2007 February 2014
Code Name G86 Cape Verde XT
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 650 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 800 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 40 watts 95 watts
Bandwidth 6400 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5200 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2600 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 16 640
Texture Mapping Units 8 40
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 80 nm 28 nm
Transistors 210 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16, PCI PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce 8400 GS 512MB vs Radeon R7 250X 2GB”
Ernesto Guerra says:

Excelente tarjeta de radeon r7 250 de verdad q la recomiendo tiene un impresionante rendimiento probado en todo tipo de juegos

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield