Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB vs Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Intro

The GeForce 8400 GS 512MB features a core clock speed of 650 MHz and a DDR2 memory frequency of 400 MHz. It also uses a 64-bit bus, and makes use of a 80 nm design. It features 16 SPUs, 8 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 250X 2GB, which has GPU core speed of 1000 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 40 Watts
Radeon R7 250X 2GB 95 Watts
Difference: 55 Watts (138%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R7 250X 2GB should be much faster than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 72000 MB/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 6400 MB/sec
Difference: 65600 (1025%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB will be a lot (about 669%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 40000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 5200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 34800 (669%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB should be much (more or less 515%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB, and capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 16000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 2600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 13400 (515%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 8400 GS 512MB Radeon R7 250X 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2007 February 2014
Code Name G86 Cape Verde XT
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 650 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 800 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 40 watts 95 watts
Bandwidth 6400 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5200 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2600 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 16 640
Texture Mapping Units 8 40
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 80 nm 28 nm
Transistors 210 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16, PCI PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce 8400 GS 512MB vs Radeon R7 250X 2GB”
Ernesto Guerra says:

Excelente tarjeta de radeon r7 250 de verdad q la recomiendo tiene un impresionante rendimiento probado en todo tipo de juegos

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield