Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X
IntroThe GeForce GTX 650 Ti comes with a GPU core clock speed of 928 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 1350 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 768 Stream Processors, 64 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which comes with clock speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthAs far as performance goes, the Radeon R7 260X should theoretically be just a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R7 260X should be a little bit (more or less 4%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon R7 260X should be a little bit (about 19%) better at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X”Why does this site never show benchmarks anymore? They used too during the old 8800/9800 2900XT/4850 days! Why not now? Just showing spec vs spec is pointless and worthless! Because All GPU architecture is different. This means a GPU with 28/Gpixels and 78 Gtexels could loose out to a GPU with 17 Gpixels and 62 Gtexels. It is just a matter of the architecture. For example the 785 vs the 6950. http://www.hwcompare.com/12077/radeon-hd-6950-vs-radeon-hd-7850/
The 6950 has a much higher texel rate and a higher pixel rate. But the 7850 out performs the 6950 by a good margin. http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/549?vs=510