Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The Radeon R7 240 features a GPU core speed of 730 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM is set to run at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 320 SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 250, which comes with a core clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1150 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R7 250 1836 points
Radeon R7 240 1218 points
Difference: 618 (51%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 35 Watts (117%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R7 250 should theoretically be quite a bit better than the Radeon R7 240 overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 44800 (156%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 is a lot (approximately 64%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9400 (64%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 is a lot (more or less 37%) better at FSAA than the Radeon R7 240, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2160 (37%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R7 240 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year October 2013 October 2013
Code Name Oland PRO Oland XT
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 730 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 30 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 14600 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 5840 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 320 384
Texture Mapping Units 20 24
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1040 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.2 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

2 Responses to “Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 250”
David says:

I'm purchasing the AMD A10-7850K APU. This APU can support the R7 240 or 250, however I was unclear which one to choose because it was tough to find real good data on the two GPU's whit side by side comparisons. The information provided in this site spelled out the differences to a novice like me so I could understand the differences between them and improved my knowledge. Thanks!

GAbriel says:

I have to say I am impressed by the 7850k by itself. Obviously with the R7 250 it will perform even better. I get around 30-50 on High details for most games. I heard that with BF4 that it gets around 40 with crossfire, which is awesome to say the least.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield