Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 295 vs Geforce GTX 680
IntroThe GeForce GTX 295 has a GPU core clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM runs at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is comprised of 240 Stream Processors, 80 Texture Address Units, and 28 Raster Operation Units.Compare all of that to the Geforce GTX 680, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1006 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1502 MHz on this particular card. It features 1536 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.
Display Graphs
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthTheoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 295 will be 16% faster than the Geforce GTX 680 in general, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)
Texel RateThe Geforce GTX 680 should be much (more or less 40%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 295. (explain)
Pixel RateThe GeForce GTX 295 will be a little bit (approximately 0%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 680, and capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
6 Responses to “GeForce GTX 295 vs Geforce GTX 680”Damn xD A GTX295 beats a GTX680
No it doesn't - this theoretical chart doesn't take internal SLI scaling efficiency of 295 in to account. In real world, 680 wipes the floor off 295.
The GTX 295 still performs impressively with current games, if you are ok with DX 10.
Also it comes quite close to the GTX 680's general performance in high resolutions. But keep in mind, that a 680 is a single graphic chip, that needs less power and has the overall way better performance than an older GTX 295.
WTF?
Theoretical BS.
here is realworld results:
http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=1519228
Lol GTX 295 comes neck to neck with GTX 680...if someone doesn't"t have problem with Dx10 he can sli them and easily in 3D programs beats all GPUs except GTX 690....
in general until 2015-2016 would be really good....then you will be able to buy from series : 9xx and 10xx...
It took a while but you can now 3-way two 295's and dedicate the last half to Phys-X.