Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GTX 295 vs Geforce GTX 680


The GeForce GTX 295 features clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Geforce GTX 680, which uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1006 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this card. It features 1536 SPUs as well as 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 680 195 Watts
GeForce GTX 295 289 Watts
Difference: 94 Watts (48%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 295 should theoretically be just a bit faster than the Geforce GTX 680 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 295 223776 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 680 192256 MB/sec
Difference: 31520 (16%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 is much (more or less 40%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 295. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 128768 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 295 92160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 36608 (40%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 295 will be a bit (more or less 0%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 680, and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 295 32256 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 680 32192 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 64 (0%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 295

Geforce GTX 680

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 295 Geforce GTX 680
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 8, 2009 March 2012
Code Name G200b GK104
Memory 896 MB (x2) 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz (x2) 1006 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz (x2) 6008 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 289 watts 195 watts
Bandwidth 223776 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 92160 Mtexels/sec 128768 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 32256 Mpixels/sec 32192 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 (x2) 1536
Texture Mapping Units 80 (x2) 128
Render Output Units 28 (x2) 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit (x2) 256-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 3540 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.


6 Responses to “GeForce GTX 295 vs Geforce GTX 680”
SpArTaN says:

Damn xD A GTX295 beats a GTX680

derp says:

No it doesn't - this theoretical chart doesn't take internal SLI scaling efficiency of 295 in to account. In real world, 680 wipes the floor off 295.

Cumshotfake says:

The GTX 295 still performs impressively with current games, if you are ok with DX 10.
Also it comes quite close to the GTX 680's general performance in high resolutions. But keep in mind, that a 680 is a single graphic chip, that needs less power and has the overall way better performance than an older GTX 295.

ggyyggygygygyyggyyg says:

Theoretical BS.

here is realworld results:

SilenceMan says:

Lol GTX 295 comes neck to neck with GTX 680...if someone doesn't"t have problem with Dx10 he can sli them and easily in 3D programs beats all GPUs except GTX 690....

in general until 2015-2016 would be really good....then you will be able to buy from series : 9xx and 10xx...

Matt says:

It took a while but you can now 3-way two 295's and dedicate the last half to Phys-X.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield