Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 285

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a core clock frequency of 1485 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 2001 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 12 nm design. It features 896 SPUs, 56 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 285, which has a core clock speed of 918 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1375 MHz. It also features a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1792 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Radeon R9 285 190 Watts
Difference: 115 Watts (153%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 285 should theoretically be quite a bit better than the GeForce GTX 1650 overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 176000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Difference: 44928 (34%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 285 is quite a bit (about 24%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 1650. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 102816 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 19656 (24%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 1650 is superior to the Radeon R9 285, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 285 29376 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 18144 (62%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 285
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 September 2014
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Tonga PRO
Memory 4096 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 918 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 5500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 190 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 176000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 102816 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 29376 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 1792
Texture Mapping Units 56 112
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 5000 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.4

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield