Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon R7 M265

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 M265, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 725 MHz, and 2048 MB of DDR3 memory running at 1000 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 SPUs, 24 TAUs, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
Radeon R7 M265		3256 points
	Difference: 2667 (82%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 M265		14 Mh/s
Geforce GTX 760		13 Mh/s
	Difference: 1 (8%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Geforce GTX 760 will be 501% quicker than the Radeon R7 M265 in general, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
Radeon R7 M265		32000 MB/sec
	Difference: 160256 (501%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 should be quite a bit (approximately 441%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 M265. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M265		17400 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 76680 (441%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 should be a lot (about 441%) more effective at AA than the Radeon R7 M265, and will be capable of handling higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M265		5800 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 25560 (441%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.