Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 270X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this card. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 TAUs and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 270X, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1400 MHz on this particular model. It features 1280 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 270X 180 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 22 Watts (12%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 270X should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 179200 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 67312 (60%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 270X should be quite a bit (more or less 93%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 80000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 38528 (93%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 270X is quite a bit (more or less 98%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, and should be able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 32000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 15872 (98%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200 Curacao XT
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 5600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 180 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 179200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 80000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 32000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 1280
Texture Mapping Units 72 80
Render Output Units 28 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 2800 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield