 |
 |
GeForce GTX 580 3GB vs Radeon HD 6970
Intro
The GeForce GTX 580 3GB comes with a GPU clock speed of 772 MHz, and the 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1002 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also is comprised of 512 SPUs, 64 TAUs, and 48 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6970, which has core speeds of 880 MHz on the GPU, and 1375 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1536 SPUs as well as 96 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 580 3GB |
|
244 Watts |
| Radeon HD 6970 |
|
250 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 580 3GB should in theory be just a bit better than the Radeon HD 6970 in general. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 580 3GB |
|
192384 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 6970 |
|
176000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 6970 should be quite a bit (approximately 71%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 580 3GB. (explain)| Radeon HD 6970 |
|
84480 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 580 3GB |
|
49408 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 580 3GB will be much (more or less 32%) better at AA than the Radeon HD 6970, and also will be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)| GeForce GTX 580 3GB |
|
37056 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6970 |
|
28160 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 580 3GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 580 3GB | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | November 2010 | December 2010 |
| Code Name | GF110 | Cayman XT |
| Memory | 3072 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 772 MHz | 880 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 4008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 244 watts | 250 watts |
| Bandwidth | 192384 MB/sec | 176000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 49408 Mtexels/sec | 84480 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 37056 Mpixels/sec | 28160 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 512 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 96 |
| Render Output Units | 48 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 3000 million | 2640 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
GeForce GTX 580 3GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
18 Responses to “GeForce GTX 580 3GB vs Radeon HD 6970”This my dream 🙂
GOOOOD fight
Does this site lean to Nvidia side on those power graps or is there just something simply wrong with the one writing em?
Power consumption numbers for gtx 500 series are fucked up
@Janus: I got the power numbers from Wikipedia. They should be the max power draw under load. Unless Wikipedia got it wrong... which is always possible.
I just checked TechARP.com's list, and the numbers are the same there as well.
How are they wrong?
No, they're wrong, 580 1.5GB goes well above 300W when under load.
Do you have a source link for that so I can get the exact numbers?
what kind of speculative, unsubstantiated garbage is this? How do you get away with posting crap like this and still manage to have any readers?
@huh?: Do you have a correction to make to the info here? We got our information either from Wikipedia or from TechARP. All we did with it is some calculations and made pretty graphs. If our original information is wrong, then the pretty graphs will be wrong too. I have made some corrections to a few things recently that turned out were input wrong... annoying, but it happens. Power consumption is max TDP, I edited the titles to make that more clear.
admin, don't mind these ppl. Although here it says the power draw is pretty different: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/305?vs=292
Btw, this site is very nice, so thanks! I hope you will support CPU comparison, too!
Thanks k 🙂 We do plan to add CPU comparisons in the future actually.
That Anandtech comparison has the power usage as total system power draw (as in, not just the card alone). I think the sources we use are probably the card alone. Though I'm not sure how they would go about measuring that... but anyway, here's Wikipedia's source for the power numbers: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/3.html
Of course those stats are pretty close to the real deal except for different manufacturers like Evga,xfx,Sapphire,HIS all change each card to their own liking but being rude is un called for.
you are all a bunch of whores
Come on,"gangsta fred",forums and communities only exist because of arguing over such trivial matters.Besides,the only right result is the one you measure yourself.However,nobody has the money to buy all of that,and we're forced to believe others.
Good job!
harter kampf trotzdem gtx580 bisschen besser
i was a "red" side big fans. but don't know some how i found that physx in "green" has more secret weapon in its "pocket".
and here am i using my 580 lightening, and it runs very perfect for kicking all latest game ass.
http://www.zeepoll.com/vs/view/71/ati-6970-vs-gtx-580
@Huh you are what people call a doos. Thanks for the input. The website clearly states more or less and that the performance may vary in real life. I have been using this website for years. Thanks!!!