Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6850
IntroThe GeForce GTX 560 Ti comes with a core clock speed of 822 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1002 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 384 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare that to the Radeon HD 6850, which makes use of a 40 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 775 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a frequency of 1000 MHz on this particular model. It features 960 SPUs as well as 48 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthPerformance-wise, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should in theory be just a bit superior to the Radeon HD 6850 in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe GeForce GTX 560 Ti is quite a bit (approximately 41%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon HD 6850. (explain)
Pixel RateIf using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the winner, but it probably won't make a huge difference. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
15 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6850”[...] combo of Mobo + GPU It still fits within his budget and gives better performance Yes, thanks! Comparison. __________________ Pro snipa... Fail not my [...]
Hi man! this pages is excelent!, but I have a daubt about texel rate and Pixel rate...
How do you calculate these values? The Official NVidia page has diferent values about them.
Thx!
this is the shittiest page ever
blindly copied numbers, no real comparison data
useless waste of bandwidth
diaf
satan's just mad he gave me a blowjob and i didn't return the favor.
Both satan and Jesus are mad cuz they aren't real.
Athiest doesn't beleive in being mad, or anything else for that matter, so he's just there, wasting space.
But can we really know for sure?
You cant ask someone to prove a negative, it doesnt work that way, for you to ask someone to prove something means you you have to prove it right first, otherwise your statement is botched.
Its really hard for anyone to disprove anything that hasnt been proven right yet, just as much as Id like you I cant prove that the easter bunny isnt real, or that the boggey man hiding in your closet isnt real.
All in all you cant ask someone "how do you know.. prove it" because the problem with that is that you havent proven your stance as correct yet, that means you cant ask someone to disprove you, when you have not proven to be correct in the first place.
Have a nice day,
lol. at comments. made my day.
[...] ti hat ne macke aber ruckeln darf da aufjedenfall nichts... bzw. schlechter als vorher laufen... GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Intel 2500k @ 4,5ghz, Asrock Extreme3 GEN3, 2x 4GB Teamgroup 1333mhz, SLI: nVidia GeForce [...]
Atheist ftw!!!!
Well the GTX 560 TI still costs around $220 while the HD 6850 is around $150. I personaly own a HD 6850 and I have no issues with it whatsoever and with the fact that it takes 43 less watts then the 560TI and costs $70 bucks cheaper I can afford to go crossfire with 2 HD 6850 for $300 bucks and 254 watts. Which would certaintly blow away the 560TI. If you went SLI with the 560 TI thats 340 watts and $440 bucks. it would most certanintly require you to buy a new psu 700 watts and up. Which I would say your safe around 550 watt psu with the hd 6850 in cf.
My own experience shows the Gigabyte HD 6850 Windforce has great overclocking potential, while operating at relatively low temps [centigrade](37 low load, 56 high load) throughout a typical session. I'm using Sapphire TRIXX (don't like, nor use, EVGA Precision X or CCC Overdrive) for my overclocking as it allows great control over: voltages, core & mem' clocks and also fan speeds. Last i looked, i had (stable):- Core: 835, Mem: 1110 & voltage at spec'. The GPU-Z readouts are:- Pixel Fill: 26.7GP/sec, Texture Fill: 40.1GT/sec, and Mem. Bandwidth: 142.1GB/sec. Now, on those figures alone, it puts the 6850 ahead on both Mem' bandwidth & Pixel Fill. That, and the fact the card is: (1) cheaper than the GTX-560Ti, (2) running at far lower TDP power consumption ($aving the owner $$$ in lower power bills), makes it a far better buying prospect overall than the GTX-560Ti. Granted they're both old/aging cards now, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why anyone choosing between these two cards might sway in favor of the Red Team (imho of course). 😉
UPDATE: After further voltage tweaking using Sapphire TRIXX, have the HD 6850 @ 1.231V. The overclocks sit at: core: 950, mem: 1175. At 950/1175, pixel fill: 30.4GP/s, Texture fill: 45.6GT/s, and Mem. Bandwidth: 150.4GB/sec .. i think on that type of huge o'cing headroom, the 6850 has to win, hands down.
I have the MSI AMD Radeon 6850 OC-Power-Edition and is very fast. Very good G-Card !!!