 |
 |
GeForce GTS 450 1GB vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Intro
The GeForce GTS 450 1GB has core speeds of 783 MHz on the GPU, and 902 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 192 SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, which makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this specific card. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTS 450 1GB |
|
106 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
202 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, in theory, should perform much faster than the GeForce GTS 450 1GB overall. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
111888 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTS 450 1GB |
|
57728 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is quite a bit (approximately 66%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTS 450 1GB. (explain)| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
41472 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTS 450 1GB |
|
25056 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, by far. (explain)| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
16128 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTS 450 1GB |
|
12528 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTS 450 1GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTS 450 1GB | GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | September 2010 | September 16, 2008 |
| Code Name | GF106 | G200 |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 896 MB |
| Core Speed | 783 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 3608 MHz | 1998 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 106 watts | 202 watts |
| Bandwidth | 57728 MB/sec | 111888 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 25056 Mtexels/sec | 41472 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 12528 Mpixels/sec | 16128 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 192 | 216 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 32 | 72 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 28 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 448-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 1170 million | 1400 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 2.0 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 10 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 3.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GTS 450 1GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTS 450 1GB vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216”[...] Some Benchmarks and Comparisons: Despite of power consumption gtx260 is far better than gts 450. GeForce GTS 450 1GB vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware... gtx 260 is closer to gtx 460 in performance but costs far less. GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs [...]