 |
 |
Radeon HD 6950 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB
Intro
The Radeon HD 6950 makes use of a 40 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 800 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1250 MHz on this model. It features 1408 SPUs as well as 88 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare that to the Radeon HD 6950 2GB, which uses a 40 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 800 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1250 MHz on this particular model. It features 1408 SPUs as well as 88 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Both cards have the same power consumption.Memory Bandwidth
Both cards have exactly the same memory bandwidth, so theoretically they should perform exactly the same. (explain)
Texel Rate
Both cards have the exact same texel fill rate, so in theory they should be equally good at at anisotropic filtering. (explain)Pixel Rate
Both cards have the exact same pixel rate, so theoretically they should be equally good at at full screen anti-aliasing, and be capable of handling the same screen resolutions. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 6950Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 6950 | Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | December 2010 | December 2010 |
| Code Name | Cayman Pro | Cayman Pro |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 200 watts | 200 watts |
| Bandwidth | 160000 MB/sec | 160000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 70400 Mtexels/sec | 70400 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 25600 Mpixels/sec | 25600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1408 | 1408 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 88 | 88 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 2640 million | 2640 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
Radeon HD 6950Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
12 Responses to “Radeon HD 6950 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB”[...] [...]
1 fps isnt much of a difference.
Remember that 2gb -version can be modded into 6970 so then it is much faster than 6950. 🙂
hahaha it's obvious this site is soooo pro nvidia!!!!
because these benchmarks are pure bullsh*t!!! you go on other sites and you clearly see the 6950 is better on these games except for dirt 2 the 560ti does ~2 fps better than the 560ti
so this is really bullsh*t!
[...] 870MHz VS Club 3d Radeon HD 6950 Core 800M Maggiori GB non vuol dire maggiori prestazioni (Click) Coming Soon... Rispondi [...]
This is a load of CRAP!!!
I Own both cards & 6950 is way better in performance than 560ti PLUS you can also bios hack 6950 into a 6970.
Compare it with a 570 will rather be a very different Story.
ati is the best >> 😀 >
ati 6950 2gb faster than card of 1gp i have 1gp lol hhh xd >>>:D
2gb is faster ,when the resolution is higher
bf3 use 1.5 gb videomemory---->
with 1gb version lagging the game with higher res
[...] AA = very hgih دز ضمن حداقل 80 تومن بین 1gb , 2gb اختلاف قیمت هستش Radeon HD 6950 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare قابل توجه شما دوست عزیز تمام تست ها هم در رزولوشن [...]
HWCompare has created a site that is based on half-truths, skewed data / cherry-picked data and misinformation. Benchmarks are false measures of true performance. These cards will NOT behave the same performance (as this HWC page wrongly concludes) in real world scenarios. The 1GB version will bottleneck at high-resolutions, while the 6950 2GB will be able to easily buffer more graphical data without raw (fps) performance degradation.
EDIT previous post: should read, "without the same level of raw (fps) performance degradation." ;P